Github actions vs jenkins stackoverflow Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; OverflowAI GenAI features for Teams; OverflowAPI Train & fine-tune LLMs; Labs The future of collective knowledge sharing; About the company And you have to update Jenkins and its plugins. If you also use the paths-filter action you can get to the result you want with something like this:. This number does not change if you re-run the workflow run. Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; I started exploring Jenkins with GitHub, Ant and Maven. 12 Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! Please be sure to answer Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; Trigger GitHub Actions for all branches except main, where the only workflow definition file is. get-environment. for example lets say my website has a huge jobs: configure: runs-on: ubuntu-latest # at first we still don't know which self-hosted server, so we just use ubuntu latest and read the JSON file outputs: # here we use the outputs from steps, and set outputs for the job `configure` config: ${{ steps. However, with GitHub actions taking the lead over Jenkins and GitLab CI coming up not too far behind, you can see that the landscape is actually still pretty competitive. Build the project. That way, the jobs can be triggered to run locally via the make command, or remotely via a GitHub Action (also using the make command, but inside a GitHub Action). It working fine, meaning it does not show the Git installation window for every git action. event. I'm positive on the benefits of CI tools like Jenkins for automatic building or testing, which GitHub Actions is Jenkins vs GitHub Actions - A comprehensive comparison of two leading CI / CD tools. Whether you need to interact with cloud providers, testing frameworks, or deployment targets, you can extend the functionality of these platforms to suit your needs. However, after Aug 13th, 2021, this stopped working raising this error: stderr: remote: Support for I'm starting to learn github actions (converting from jenkins piplines). How do I translate it to Github Actions? What is the GitHub Action equivalent of VSBuild@1? azure; azure-devops; azure-pipelines; github-actions; azure-pipelines-yaml; Share. github/actions/my-action the name of the my-action. This number begins at 1 for the workflow's first run, and One way I could think of raising a PR on GitHub using Jenkins is by using GitHub's API. Actions looks like GitLab CI/CD but there are some differences between them. com, although the Actions are coming with GHE, GitHub Enterprise, in Beta, starting Sept. md file. GitHub Actions does not have a post equivalent. This means the code has to run on an instance running in my AWS environment. 401. NET Core as the app's tech stack here, although that shouldn't matter much. GitHub Actions offers a In this article, we will discuss two popular CI/CD tools — Jenkins and GitHub Actions — providing an in-depth analysis to empower users to make an informed choice based on their preferences, GitHub Actions and Jenkins are both continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) tools that help automate the software development process. First workflow: name: Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; OverflowAI GenAI features for Teams; OverflowAPI Train & fine-tune LLMs; Labs The future of collective knowledge sharing; About the company According to the github action documentation, it should work in the same workflow using multiple paths. yml and services. I cannot figure out when or why variables should be referenced using double curly braces vs single curly braces. In this article, we will delve into the depths of Jenkins and GitHub Actions, comparing their features, strengths, and use cases to help GitHub Actions vs. js) projects and add variables as secrets to GITHUB_ENV. local files as well, but as @rethab said, you should not check those files in. name: CI on: pull_request: branches: - test/* types: [ closed ] jobs: build: if: github. Note: Just for your information, the github event has the following info (removed the irrelevant data for brevity) regarding the label in case of labelling a PR Note that Git still clones whole repository to local disk. Stack Overflow. github. Github Actions just feels better, built on the principle of declarative configuration. 4. Github project setup in Jenkins 2. I believe you would specifically need the "Create a pull request" API. 5. 2020). The code in the We have a Jenkins job that is triggered by a Github Action (listed below). What is the difference between a these Jenkins project types: Pipeline Multi Branch Pipeline Github Organization I am using a Jenkinsfile. Instead use the "Checkout to specific local branch" in the "Additional Behaviors" section to set the "Branch name" to master. When choosing between GitHub Actions and Jenkins for your CI/CD pipeline, it’s crucial to understand their respective strengths and weaknesses. Create a webhook in github and configure jenkins url and events you want to trigger the github actions. There are plugins that CodePipeline is a continuous "deployment" tool, while Jenkins is more of a continuous "integration" tool. The GitHub I'm still not clear on whether or not you were able to perform the action via the API. ) Paralellism Every CI I know GitHub strongly recommends against using self-hosted runners with GitHub Actions on public repos specifically because of security concerns. on: pull_request: branches: - main types: [closed] jobs: my The git checkout master of the answer by Woland isn't needed. In GitHub settings I see a lot of events, I think Check runs might be the one? But it says created, requested or completed, so I don't know how would Jenkins know that the workflows ran successfully inspired by Valentine Shis answer above, I created a GitHub Action for this use-case and the one I had at the time while reading this thread. Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; If you can curl your Jenkins instance from your GitHub Action script, you can add multiple parameters to that curl command. Creating a GitHub Action which runs a Powershell script on a Windows host. But it is very "confused" regarding what should be highlighted. [Optional] Perform post-build steps(s), (such as Archive Artifacts, send email, etc). GitHub Action to read . Create a new job in Jenkins, set Git repository in Source Code Management section. This is the shorthand format, and it doesn't support contexts and expressions: runs-on: ubuntu-latest needs: [get-environment] environment: ${{ needs. Github actions also has support for self-hosted runners, and there is also the security hardening guidelines for managing signing keys. This is my current release_sphinx job that uses the deploy-action-for-github-pages action and uploads to github-pages:. Installed jenkins. It's also possible to specify the path to the action within the repository, rather than using . . get-attribute. The first workflow (which is triggered manually) triggers the second one on completion. run_number: A unique number for each run of a particular workflow in a repository. 230. This line: - uses: actions/checkout@test-master indicates that you want to use the actions/checkout action at version test-master. " I think that means it pretty much does the Poll SCM like in the I am migrating such pipelines to Github Actions YAML Format. io Github Actions or SLAs. ref }} I'm therefore curious why it was I have a github repository which is doing CI/CD using github actions that need more than what the github-hosted runners can do. I have: - a public github repository - a localhost:8080 jenkins - a java maven project connected to the github repository - a jenkins job connected to the github repo I am able to trigger manual builds anytime, but I want to have a build triggered at each commit pushed to the github repository. Specifically, malicious users can fork your repo and create a pull request to the original repo to launch a pull_request -triggered workflow (if it exists). Continuous integration is a DevOps software development practice where developers regularly merge their code changes into a central repository, after which automated builds and tests are run. For each changed service repository dispatch Luckily the aws-sdk should automatically detect credentials set as environment variables and use them for requests. You can also use github. on: pull_request: branches: - master types: [closed] jobs: I am converting a Jenkins declarative pipeline into a GitHub Actions workflow. There is no such version of the action. Another option is to put all the work into makefiles, and using GitHub Action(s) to call make. With Github Actions, you use specify which version of the action you want - done. I am not super familiar with yaml. Low Barrier to Entry: GitHub Actions offers a seamless setup process with no hardware constraints. And I configured GitHub-webhook using ngrok. Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Github Jenkins plugin with Github Enterprise. github; github-api; commit; Floren. GitHub has an API to work with pull requests. Home; Features; Pricing; Happy users; Docs; FAQ; Jenkins' popularity ensures you'll find support in various places (official Jenkins forum, IRC, StackOverflow etc. release_sphinx: needs: [build] runs-on: ubuntu I have configured Jenkins in my local machine (Mac) to build a GitHub project. We were using GitHub plugin with Username and password credentials so far in our Jenkins setup. on: workflow_run: workflows: [""your_workflow_name""] types: - completed Configure the POST api call from jenkins to github along with the The Jenkins post condition fixed applies if the current run is successful and the previous run failed or was unstable. You use if to define the build state GitHub copied a lot of Gitlab`s features, including CI (similar configuration and price). I understand how to pull from my repository, build, test my application. So if you have the setting x must pass before branch can be merged, some actions could get stuck in limbo forever. To get access to secrets in your action, you need to set them in the repo. For example: steps: - uses: . Then you can expose them to the step as an env var. This is also why "push an empty commit" or "close and reopen the PR" can unstuck it--because then the PR is no longer purely action triggered. I have a Github Action, which does Built, Test, Publish and Deploy (using FTP). Knapsack Pro. Trigger Jenkins Pipeline on: push: branches: - develop I got it to work, but there is no dedicated action to build and host sphinx docs on either github pages or readthedocs as of yet, so as far as I am concerned there is quite a bit left to be desired here. There are two different approaches I'd like to discuss: 1. "Build outside": build/compile app in GitHub Actions runner, copy output into container image This is a great explanation, especially because adding ${{ github. I'm gonna pick ASP. Open projects's workspace folder, delete everything there except . Compared to the past If you look at previous years of the results of the same survey, say in 2018 , you'll find that Jenkins used to have a much larger share and there wasn't really much competition: Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; and then enter the URL of the webhook that jenkins is expecting (look at this jenkins plugin for setting up jenkins to receive these hooks from github). A normal action can be used, so you have to define an job/step for this activity - for a functional equivalent. GitHub Hosted Runners run in a container. Both Jenkins and GitHub Actions have strengths in automating CI/CD pipelines, but they excel at different needs. But, I am getting the Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; I am making some workflows in GitHub Actions. Most of the power comes from being self-contained and integrating everything in the same product under the same browser tab: from repository browser, issue board or build history to deployment tools and monitoring. workflow }}-${{ github. I will be looking at two such pieces of software, Jenkins and Github Actions. Jenkins is the de-facto standard for a self-hosted, open We have Jenkins 2 set to build every push to GitHub, and we do not use the Pull Request builder (although commits that are part of a pull request obviously will get built, as well). If you want to check out your branch called test-master, specify it as an Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; I set up the Github webhook in Jenkins and I created a job with the following configuration: However, every time I push something from any branch, You could also run some script to discover which services were changed based on git diff and trigger corresponding job via GitHub REST API. Given that: these jobs run Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; While there is no specific merged type for pull requests, there is however a merged flag on the API response. You want actions/checkout@v2. I came across this approach mentioned here (one of the top comments on this thread). No need for webhooks anymore, since you now how GitHub Actions (assuming you are using github. GitLab CI/CD has integration with Pages, issues, packages registry, it has environments dashboard, review support, manual pipelines, multi-project pipelines, support a lot of different reports I am migrating my deployment from Jenkins to GitHub Actions. This would allow one to do the following, assuming we want to run an action on any merge to the main branch:. Setting up a workflow through a config file is just so simple. Follow edited May 9, 2022 at 4:57. config }} platform: ${{ steps. workflow}} is important when there are different workflows to consider. There could be two workflows main. xml Our artifact repositry is Jfrog and we Jenkins vs Github Actions comparison of Continuous Integration servers What are the differences between Jenkins and Github Actions? Jenkins https://jenkins. Set "Discover pull requests from origin" and "Discover pull requests from forks" (Configure > Projects > GitHub Organization > Within repository) to the "merging the pull request with the current target branch revision": I am trying to trigger jenkins build with GitHub Action using following workflow file name: Trigger Jenkins Build [ Backend ] on: pull_request: branches: [ master ] types: [ closed ] env: Skip to main content. But I Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; There's a github action that sets this up as well. js (but also non Next. local] files in Next. Since github. I'm intrigued by its features and integrations, but I'd love to hear your experiences and opinions before fully committing to the transition. If the software you need isn't preinstalled, you can always use apt or setup scripts since you're already using Ubuntu on your current machine. Is there any similar approach in GitHub actions. So, this Jenkins server is by default not accessable for a webhook in the Git project. Jenkins The granddaddy of CI/CD jenkins. (Notice: you can use Webhook relay to simulate real webhooks). For more details see GitHub Encrypted secrets. Recently though, I was looking for a way to make a webhook fire when a pull request is made against a Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; With . yml file in your own repository. Technically it would load . It’s one of Jenkins’s powerful features. Not using a dash, however, means the uses belongs to the same step as name. For some other tasks, we need lots of CPU cores and local disk. Perform build step(s), (such as build Ant project, compile code, etc). Here is my build flow on What are the differences for Github Actions or Jenkins? Alternatives for CI automated testing. action == 'labeled' as an extra check but that is not required if you have only types: [ labeled ] for the pull_request as shown in the config above. It seems that a slightly simpler group is as effective: group: ${{ github. Jenkins 🎯 Both Jenkins and GitHub Actions are powerful options worth considering when planning out your project's CI/CD strategy. I created a test repository to validate the verified PR creation, and I see the GitHub Action generating the new README. GitHub Action: next-env. So, Jenkins is good for flexibility and customization and has extensive integrations, which it's best Choosing between GitHub Actions and Jenkins isn’t about picking a “winner” — it’s about selecting the tool that best fits your project’s needs, your team’s skills, and your organization’s requirements. It says "This trigger only kicks Git plugin internal polling algo for every incoming event against matched repo. Jenkins boasts over 1,500 plugins that extend its capabilities. I think for Pipeline, it just supports one Branch, where as Multi Branch supports any branch. yml. Jenkins has a plugin - "HTTP Request" to make HTTP requests. Just to clarify one of the previous answers and why it works, you can put expressions like what you want in the environment, but you can only do it if you pass an object. read-json. This will clone whole repository to local disk. 0. However, Jenkins' popularity ensures you'll find support in various places (official Jenkins forum, IRC, StackOverflow etc. ref for pull requests it is refs/pull/<pr_number>/merge it is also sufficiently unique. Setting up a workflow GitHub Actions is relatively but has same basic premise, allow developers to continuously build, test, package, and deploy their software. Asynchronous In this case I have a Jenkins server running on my local PC. But that won't check if any new changes there or not and trigger directly. Set the Status Result to One of the default messages and statuses . /path with: Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; OverflowAI GenAI features for Teams; New to CI/CD Integration. verbose=true In Jenkins, there is a poll scm option. Learn about key features, similarities, and differences to choose the right solution for your project's automation needs. James Z. So polling logic in fact belongs There're restrictions on github actions triggering other github actions, by design. I'm Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private commits, using GitHub's Graphql API. I want to trigger a Git Action after a Jenkins Job ("Example Jenkins Job") already - uses: actions/checkout@v2 - name: Cache Nuget uses: actions/cache@v1 If you also prefix the last line with a dash (-), then GitHub thinks the name is a separate step and it doesn't know what to do with it. In multiple ways. In jenkins post-build action I have the following properties-Dsonar. Github Organization not sure. In this article, we will look into the security aspects of CI/CD pipelines, focusing on comparing GitHub Actions and Jenkins—two popular CI/CD tools today and how they handle With Github Actions, you use specify which version of the action you want - done. According to the video posted on youtube Jenkin-GitHub-Ant-Maven, I did what you said. 501; asked 16 I'm trying to get the GitHub webhook from my private repository to instigate Recently, we have ported our build pipeline from jenkins build to Github Actions. ) Yes Community support available for any tier, unclear at what point Extensibility: Both Jenkins and GitHub Actions support extensibility through plugins and actions, respectively, allowing users to integrate with third-party tools and services. How can I avoid overusing her/she or the character name when describing character action The GitHub plugin lists the Git plugin as a dependency. You use needs to define the previous jobs it depends on. In the github action you want to trigger after jenkins build, you need to add the following line. Only run GitHub actions if pr target is . Related. In the next sections I'll have a brief description of each software, a comparison, and a finally a conclusion. github. GitHub announced an upcoming feature, GitHub Actions. How can I trigger another job from a jenkins pipeline (jenkinsfile) with GitHub Org Plugin? 3. [Optional] Perform SCM checkout, (such as SVN or Git). That's not too bad however, because it is compressed. Github actions share workspace/artifacts between jobs? I don't want to have to manage uploading uploading artifacts to a separate service and then deleting them afterwards. run_id: A unique number for each workflow run within a repository. I have a dedicated Windows Server somewhere, which accepts the published version of my repo. Of course this is a proprietary service provided by I agree with most of Rik's notes, but my opinion about which is a simpler is the opposite: GitLab is proving to be an awesome tool to work with. Is it possible to route github actions to different self-hosted runners based on the I've been exploring GitHub Actions lately as a CI/CD instead of using GitLab or Jenkins. Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; If jenkins will receive PUSH GitHub hook from repo defined in Git SCM section it will trigger Git SCM polling logic. For example, let’s consider a pipeline that uses plugins for Git integration and Docker build: Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; In this Github Actions deployment script example, the author separate the build and deployment into distinct jobs. Main workflow will be configured to be started always on push and it will only start script to find out which services were changed. What has been your experience with GitHub Actions compared to GitLab or Jenkins? Any notable advantages or disadvantages you've encountered? How was It says that is has support for GitHub Workflows and GitHub Actions. The . [development|test|production][. login=bhuwang -Dsonar. Which will run the job at a scheduled time only if there is any new change from previous build in source repository. Here a some pros and cons of both: Advantages of GitHub Actions. About; Products OverflowAI; Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Let's say we're using GitHub Actions to build and publish a container image of our app. Two giants in this domain, Jenkins and GitHub Actions, stand out as powerful contenders. So, Jenkins is good for flexibility and customization and has extensive integrations, which it's best suited for enterprise environments and complex workflows, while GitHub Actions shines with ease of use and tight GitHub integration and maintenance, Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; I expected the output gzip image to be same when generated on GitHub actions execution vs local GitBash execution. 2 Am using Github jenkins plugin (comes with Jenkins) to manually configure a webhook and have it run on every action thus triggering my Jenkins job. For some tasks, we need to test CUDA code on GPUs. As explained on this thread, you can trigger, on GitHub side, a job when a pull request is merged on master:. git folder. Check your result on GitHub: Check if you get the build status and build execution duration on your GitHub commit. platform }} steps: - name: Different between Azure DevOps versus GitHub Actions: Azure Pipelines supports a legacy classic editor, which lets you define your CI configuration in a GUI editor instead of creating the pipeline definition in a YAML file. There is schedule option as in this link. io. A reusable workflow does not have to be in the same repository, and can Using Jenkins v2. I want to update Pull Request from Github with Jenkins build statuses. Features; Pricing; Happy users; Docs; FAQ; Get started free; Knapsack Pro. My Configuration: Installed Sonar with github. environment_name }} # fails Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; OverflowAI GenAI features for Teams; OverflowAPI Train & fine-tune LLMs; Labs The future of collective knowledge sharing; About the company At a glance, here is Jenkins' job workflow (without additional plugins) [On demand, if needed] Install tools, (such as JDK, Ant, Maven, etc). But one of the steps I currently perform inside of Jenkins is to update my infrastructure using Terraform. The uses keyword of github actions is used to specify the action that should be executed as part of a workflow. It of course helps that I don't have to configure anything else, like I had to do in Jenkins. The wiki says "when creating a job, specify URL under "Github project" and select Git specify URL under "Source Code Management". The plugins integrate with various version control systems to deploy applications to different environments. x. Reuse portion of github action across jobs: In that question the only difference between the jobs is a single variable, so accepted answer is to use a build matrix. Github Actions don't support Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; Invoke GitHub Actions workflow manually and pass parameters. / value tells GitHub to use the action defined in the current repository, rather than referencing a pre-built action. For starters, here is how you would run this locally, cross-platform: docker build --name --tag my Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Another way to do it, if you want better control is to use GitHub actions in the middle, and write a very simple job that triggers the webhook when ever there is push to master/develop branch. Jenkins was initially released in 2011 and has an even older history under another name, Hudson. The git commit -am "blah" is still Let me lay out my understanding of the situation with GitHub Actions: Github Actions can do two things: Launch a Container; Run JavaScript; Running a container within a container is a considered a bad idea, and in fact, support for it is going away in the near future. There is an If you don't have access to the global settings of the GitHub Branch Source plugin you can change settings for the specific Jenkins folder. Products OverflowAI; Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about I am using Github as my source control, and using Github Actions as my CI/CD solution. The tools you choose to automate critical processes and piece By transitioning from Jenkins to GitHub Actions, you can streamline your workflows within a modern and collaborative environment, leveraging GitHub's robust ecosystem for continuous integration and delivery. On GitHub, navigate to the main page of the repository Problem: I am setting up jenkins + sonar + github integration for automatic pullrequest static code check through sonar. Differences: When you want to use an action, you specify the action name and the version of the action to run. This allows you to run actions only on merges, rather than all pushes to the target branch. Example: name: Trigger Jenkins Build [ Build-Portal ] on: push: branches: [ develop ] paths: - 'frontend/**' - 'backend/**' types: [closed] jobs: build: name: Triggering Pros and Cons of GitHub Actions and Jenkins. We rely on the following bit of code in the pipeline to override the status of our Protractor test stage by checking the output of a series of txt files with booleans in for whether a scenario passed or failed: Github Actions vs Jenkins: Further comparison is shown in tabular form below: N/B: GitOps is the practice of managing infrastructure and configuration using Source Version Control Platform Git. env. If you were, why not just bypass the plugin and make your own calls to GitHub via the API? – Jacob. When the Git GitHub Actions now has a unique number and ID for a run/build in the github context. I am not convinced with the "Deploy" idea. What Are the Disadvantages of GitHub Actions? While GitHub Actions offers many benefits, it also comes with a set of limitations that may impact your workflow. We build our application WAR using mvn clean deploy -U -B -s settings. repository=company/repo -Dsonar. You Configure your Jenkins Job: Add Set GitHub commit status as Post-build action. However, there are differences between them Jenkins shines in scenarios where customization and complex pipelines are paramount, while GitHub Actions excels in providing an integrated, streamlined experience for GitHub-centric development workflows. Getting: POST /github-webhook/ I don't want the job to be triggered on push event but when Github Actions workflows are done and successful. /. So for any push events, the Jenkins in my local machine is triggered Here is a link to the Github Actions wiki for migrating from jenkins. outputs. fnkpm eslaod quhvglu kvhb uws usmv wlkxj kwuicm nydtse tann